Bayesian Estimation of Augmented Exponential Strength Reliability Models Under Non-informative Priors

N. Chandra and V. K. Rathaur


Stress-Strength reliability, Augmentation, Exponential Distribution, Inverse Gaussian distribution, Metropolis-Hasting Algorithm.


In this article, the augmented strength reliability models are derived by assuming that the Inverse Gaussian stress(Y) is subjected to equipment having exponential strength(X) and are independent to each other.In a real life situations many manufactured new equipments/ products are being failed completely or partially at very early stage of its use, due to lack of its strength. Hence, ASP is proposed to protect such types of failures. The maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayes estimation of augmented strength reliability are considered. In Bayesian paradigm the non-informative types (uniform and Jeffrey’s) priors are chosen under symmetric and asymmetric loss functions for better comprehension. A comparison between the ML and Bayes estimators of augmented strength reliability is carried out on the basis of their mean square errors (mse) by simulating Monte-Carlo samples from posterior distribution by using Metropolis-Hasting approximation.

URL http://dspace.chitkara.edu.in/jspui/bitstream/1/785/3/51002_MJIS_Chandra.pdf
DOI 10.15415/mjis.2016.51002
  • Alam, S.N. and Roohi (2002). On Augmenting Exponential Strength-Reliability, Journal of Indian Association for Productivity, Quality & Reliability Transactions, 27(2), 111–117
  • Alam, S.N. and Roohi (2003). On Facing an Exponential Stress with Strength having Power Function Distribution, Aligarh Journal of Statistics, 23, 57–63.
  • Bhattacharya, G.K. and Johnson R.A. (1974). Estimation of Reliability in a Multi- Component Stress-Strength model, Journal of American Statistical Association, 69, 966–70.
  • Birnbaum, Z.W. (1956). On a Use of the Mann-Whitney Statistic, Proceeding of BerkeleySymposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 13–17.
  • Birnbaum, Z.W. and McCarty, B.(1958). A Distribution Free upper Confidence bound forP(Y<X) based on independent samples of X and Y, Annual Mathematical Statistics, 29, 558–562.
  • Brooks, S. (1998). Markov chain montecarlo method and its application. J. R. Statist. Soc. Ser.D, 47, 69–100.
  • Chandra, N. and Sen, S. (2014). Augmented Strength Reliability of Equipment Under Gamma Distribution, Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, 13, 212–221.
  • Chandra, N. and Rathaur, V.K. (2015a). Augmented Strategy Plans for Enhancing Strength Reliability of an Equipment under Inverse Gaussian Distribution. J. Math. Engg. Sci. Aerospace: Special Issue on Reliability and Dependability Modeling Analysis for Complex Systems , 6, 233–243.
  • Chandra, N. and Rathaur, V.K. (2015b). Augmenting Exponential Stress-Strength Reliability for a coherent system. Proceedings of National Seminar on Statistical Methods and Data Analysis, published by AbhiruchiPrakashana, Mysore. 25-34.
  • Chandra, N. and Rathaur, V.K. (2015c). Augmented Gamma Strength Reliability Modelsfor Series and Parallel Coherent System , Proceedings of National Conference on Emerging Trends in Statistical Research: Issue and Challenges, Narosa Publication, New Delhi, India, 43–54.
  • Chhikara, R.S. and Folks, J.L. (1977). The Inverse Gaussian distribution as a Lifetime Model, Technimetrics, 19(4), 461–468.
  • Church, J.D. and Harris, B. (1970). The Estimation of Reliability from stress- strengthrelationship, Technimetrics, 12, 49–54.
  • Draper, N.R. and Guttman, I. (1978). Bayesian analysis in multi-component stress-strength models, Communications in Statistics, 7, 441–451.
  • Enis, P., Geisser, S. (1971). Estimation of the Probability that Y<X, Journal of AmericanStatistical Association, 66, 162–8.
  • Govindarajulu, Z. (1968). Distribution-free confidence bounds for P(X<Y), Annals of theInstitute of Statistical Mathematics, 20, 229–238.
  • Hastings, W. (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov Chains and their applications. Biometrika , 55, 97–109.
  • Islam, H.M. and Khan, M.A. (2009). On System reliability with single strength and Multi-component stress model, International Journal of Quality, Reliability and Management, 26(3), 302–307.
  • Jeffreys, H. (1998). The Theory of Probability. OxfordUniversity Press, New York, NY, 3 rd ed.
  • Khan, M.A. and Islam, H.M. (2007 a). On facing Rayleigh stress with strength havingpower function distribution, Journal of Applied Statistics and Science, 16(2), 9–18.
  • Khan, M.A. and Islam, H.M. (2007 b): On Stress and Strength having power function distribution, Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 23(1), 83-88.
  • Khan, M.A. and Islam, H.M. (2012). On System Reliability for Multi-component Half-Normal Life Time, Electronic Journals of Applied Statistical Analysis, 5(1), 132–136.
  • Kotz, S., Lumelskii, Y., &Pensky, M. (2003). The stress-strength model and its generalizations. Theory and Applications. Singapore: World Scientific, 43, 44.
  • Majumdar, M. (1970). Some Estimates of reliability using inference theory, Naval ResearchLogistic, 17(2), 159–65.
  • Reiser, B. and Guttman, I. (1986). Statistical inference for P(X<Y): The Normal case, Technimetrics, 28, 253–57.
  • Sarhan, A. M., Smith, B. and Hamilton, D.C.(2015). Estimation of P( Y < X ) for a Two-parameter Bathtub Shaped Failure Rate Distribution. International J. of Statist. Prob . 4, 33–45.
  • Sharma,V.K., Singh, S.K., Singh, U. and Agiwal, V.(2015). The inverse Lindley distribution: a stress-strength reliability model with application to head and neck cancer data. J. of Indust. and Product. Engg ., 32, 162–173.
  • Varian, H. R. (1975). A Bayesian approach to real estate assessment. In Studies in Bayesian Econometrics and Statistics in Honor of Leonard J. Savage, eds. Stephan E. Fienberg and Arnold Zellner, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 195–208.
  • Zellner, A. (1986). Bayesian estimation and prediction using asymmetric loss functions. J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 81, 446–451.